nanog mailing list archives
Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...?
From: Edward McNair <emcnair () nanog org>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 16:24:19 -0700
I don’t understand the impact. Those who are comfortable with using the mailing list via email would just keep doing what they are doing now. With the exact same email address. There should be no procedural changes. In theory, we could make the change tomorrow, and you shouldn’t notice a difference. That said, we are going to do extensive test with the board, staff, NANOG committees, and beta testers. No changes will be made without extensive testing, committee and community feedback, and board approval. We will not make any changes until we are certain that there will be adverse effects for our community. Edward McNair Executive Director emcnair () nanog org | +1 866-902-1336 ext. 102 | www.nanog.org NANOG | 305 E. Eisenhower Pkwy, Suite 100 | Ann Arbor, MI 48108, USA
On Mar 22, 2021, at 3:46 PM, Karl Auer <kauer () biplane com au> wrote: On Mon, 2021-03-22 at 16:08 -0600, David Siegel wrote:We are not anticipating any material impacts to any subscribers, whether real people or list archivers.The material impact of moving to discourse will be the effective loss of numerous active members. I would suspect, also, that this would include disproportionately many of it's most valued active members. Regards, K. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Karl Auer (kauer () biplane com au) http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer GPG fingerprint: 2561 E9EC D868 E73C 8AF1 49CF EE50 4B1D CCA1 5170 Old fingerprint: 8D08 9CAA 649A AFEF E862 062A 2E97 42D4 A2A0 616D
Current thread:
- Re: OT: Re: Facebook and other walled gardens, (continued)
- Re: OT: Re: Facebook and other walled gardens Mark Tinka (Mar 23)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Bryan Fields (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? scott (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Edward McNair (Mar 22)
- Message not available
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Edward McNair (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? scott (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? scott (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? David Siegel (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Grant Taylor via NANOG (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Karl Auer (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Edward McNair (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? james.cutler () consultant com (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Jim Popovitch via NANOG (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? james.cutler () consultant com (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Edward McNair (Mar 23)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Alfie Pates (Mar 23)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Mark Tinka (Mar 23)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? David Siegel (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Jim Mercer (Mar 23)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Karl Auer (Mar 22)
- Re: [External] Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Hunter Fuller via NANOG (Mar 22)