nanog mailing list archives
Re: OT: Re: Facebook and other walled gardens
From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 11:41:22 -0700
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 10:23 AM Andy Ringsmuth <andy () andyring com> wrote:
No. Use a communication method that is available globally, not proprietary and doesn’t require me to sell my soul to the devil simply to participate.
Hi Andy, I refused to get a Facebook account until I was paid to. Now that I have one, I wonder why I bothered. I isolate it in its own browser profile so it can't snoop the rest of my web activity and I gave it an alias email address that only they have. I mostly control what information I give them. I like having an effortless way to keep up with my extended friends and family. In spite of that, I was surprised how good a job Facebook did targeting ads to my interests -- the knight hoodies were just too cool.
Sigh. It is probably a losing battle. You kids get off my grass!
The world moves on. I still don't like the idea of Facebook, but I actually like Facebook. Regards, Bill Herrin P.S. Facebook's "Portal Plus" device is simply the best personal video conferencing device I've ever used. Clear audio. Following camera that keeps you in frame. It's slick. P.p.s. Did you know that accessing customers' private information without the customer's explicit permission is a zero-tolerance first-time firing offense at Facebook? I didn't! Seems they got religion after Cambridge Analytica. They even have strong technical controls to stop it. They process the heck out of your data but they do not, do not look. -- William Herrin bill () herrin us https://bill.herrin.us/
Current thread:
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...?, (continued)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Joly MacFie (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Mike Hammett (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Bryan Fields (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Mike Hammett (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Seth Mattinen (Mar 22)
- OT: Re: Facebook and other walled gardens Grant Taylor via NANOG (Mar 22)
- Re: OT: Re: Facebook and other walled gardens Michael Thomas (Mar 22)
- Re: OT: Re: Facebook and other walled gardens Andy Ringsmuth (Mar 22)
- Re: OT: Re: Facebook and other walled gardens Ethan O'Toole (Mar 22)
- Re: OT: Re: Facebook and other walled gardens Andy Ringsmuth (Mar 22)
- Re: OT: Re: Facebook and other walled gardens William Herrin (Mar 22)
- Re: OT: Re: Facebook and other walled gardens Michael Thomas (Mar 22)
- Re: OT: Re: Facebook and other walled gardens Christopher Conforti (Mar 23)
- Re: OT: Re: Facebook and other walled gardens Mark Tinka (Mar 23)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Bryan Fields (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? scott (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Edward McNair (Mar 22)
- Message not available
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Edward McNair (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? scott (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? scott (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? David Siegel (Mar 22)