nanog mailing list archives
Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...?
From: Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 09:00:45 -0500 (CDT)
The migration happened just a month or two ago. Are we talking about the same thing? TBH, most discussion in the WISP space has moved to Facebook. The busy WISPA mailing lists used to get about 20k messages per year. When I last checked, they were down to 5k or so and on a downward trend. Meanwhile, the Facebook groups have exploded, both in members per group and the number of groups. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest-IX http://www.midwest-ix.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bryan Fields" <Bryan () bryanfields net> To: nanog () nanog org Sent: Monday, March 22, 2021 8:21:23 AM Subject: Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? On 3/22/21 9:05 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
Usually efforts like this suck, but whatever WISPA did this year with the migration from a mailman system to an integrated forum\mailing list solution seems to work really well. It's not exactly like mailman, but it works very well.
I used to read that, and ISP-Wireless prior, but after the migration it just stopped working. After migration the content quality went down and the pagination on a forum sucks. The other major issue with a forum is it allows any admin to go in and edit your message/post. Unless you've setup moderation on the mailing list, this is generally not possible. The other advantage to a list is you can sign your messages to prevent these sorts of shenanigans. Simply put, if the option is there, it will be used. -- Bryan Fields 727-409-1194 - Voice http://bryanfields.net
Current thread:
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...?, (continued)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Bryan Fields (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Mike Hammett (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Mike Hammett (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Grant Taylor via NANOG (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? David Siegel (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? james.cutler () consultant com (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Rich Kulawiec (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Joly MacFie (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Mike Hammett (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Bryan Fields (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Mike Hammett (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Seth Mattinen (Mar 22)
- OT: Re: Facebook and other walled gardens Grant Taylor via NANOG (Mar 22)
- Re: OT: Re: Facebook and other walled gardens Michael Thomas (Mar 22)
- Re: OT: Re: Facebook and other walled gardens Andy Ringsmuth (Mar 22)
- Re: OT: Re: Facebook and other walled gardens Ethan O'Toole (Mar 22)
- Re: OT: Re: Facebook and other walled gardens Andy Ringsmuth (Mar 22)
- Re: OT: Re: Facebook and other walled gardens William Herrin (Mar 22)
- Re: OT: Re: Facebook and other walled gardens Michael Thomas (Mar 22)
- Re: OT: Re: Facebook and other walled gardens Christopher Conforti (Mar 23)
- Re: OT: Re: Facebook and other walled gardens Mark Tinka (Mar 23)