nanog mailing list archives
Re: 5G roadblock: labor
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2020 18:53:03 +0200
On 5/Jan/20 14:48, John D'Ambrosia wrote:
Sabri At the very end you note 100base-t as a precursor to 400g. 100baset really found its success as an access solution - computer connections. 400GbE will be an aggregation / core solution. It will be some time if ever where 400GbE is used as an access solution - perhaps some hpc applications. Why? Cost and no need for that sort of bw.
And in those days, you'd be lucky if you can sustain 2Mbps on wi-fi. Today, I can do several-hundred Mbps on all my 802.11ac devices in my house (up to 867Mbps to my laptop and wireless-USB-adapter-equipped desktop). Even if we had to compromise this somewhat for massive, dense deployment in crowded locations within busy cities, the utility would still be miles ahead of what we got from Fast-E 25 years ago. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor, (continued)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mark Tinka (Jan 05)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Michael Thomas (Jan 06)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mark Tinka (Jan 06)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Shane Ronan (Jan 06)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Michael Thomas (Jan 05)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mark Tinka (Jan 05)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Michael Thomas (Jan 06)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mark Tinka (Jan 06)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Shane Ronan (Jan 06)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor John D'Ambrosia (Jan 05)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mark Tinka (Jan 05)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Sabri Berisha (Jan 05)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Andrey Kostin (Jan 06)
- RE: 5G roadblock: labor ouissal porly (Jan 06)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mark Tinka (Jan 03)
- Message not available
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Shane Ronan (Jan 06)