nanog mailing list archives
Re: 10g residential CPE
From: Mikael Abrahamsson via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2020 17:41:41 +0100 (CET)
On Sat, 26 Dec 2020, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
That is why. The RTT to the source can not be larger than the minimum buffer size in the transport path. Otherwise the speed will start decreasing.
This is no longer correct. There has been lots of TCP innovation since this was true.
Please stop repeating it. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- Re: 10g residential CPE, (continued)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Niels Bakker (Dec 25)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Michael Thomas (Dec 25)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mel Beckman (Dec 25)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mark Tinka (Dec 25)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Niels Bakker (Dec 26)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mark Tinka (Dec 26)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mikael Abrahamsson via NANOG (Dec 26)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mark Tinka (Dec 26)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mikael Abrahamsson via NANOG (Dec 26)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Baldur Norddahl (Dec 26)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mikael Abrahamsson via NANOG (Dec 26)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Baldur Norddahl (Dec 26)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mikael Abrahamsson via NANOG (Dec 26)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Baldur Norddahl (Dec 26)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mikael Abrahamsson via NANOG (Dec 26)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Baldur Norddahl (Dec 26)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Filip Hruska (Dec 26)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Baldur Norddahl (Dec 26)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mel Beckman (Dec 26)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Michael Thomas (Dec 26)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mark Tinka (Dec 26)