Re: Ipv6 help

[JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>]

This one is the published version:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8683/
 

El 27/8/20 8:10, "NANOG en nombre de Mark Tinka" <nanog-bounces+jordi.palet=consulintel.es () nanog org en nombre de 
mark.tinka () seacom com> escribió:



    On 27/Aug/20 07:58, Bjørn Mork wrote:

    > Because NAT64 implies DNS64, which avoids NATing any dual stack service.
    > This makes a major difference today.

    NAT64/DNS64 was the original solution.

    464XLAT is the improved approach.

    See:

        https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment-04.html

    Mark.



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be 
for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, 
distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly 
prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any 
disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached 
files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to 
inform about this communication and delete it.