![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: Ipv6 help
From: Bjørn Mork <bjorn () mork no>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 07:58:15 +0200
Brian Johnson <brian.johnson () netgeek us> writes:
1) It needs *much less* IPv4 addresses (in the NAT64) for the same number of customers.I cannot see how this is even possible. If I use private space internally to the CGN, then the available external space is the same and the internal customers are the same and I can do the same over sub ratio under both circumstance. Tell me how the math is different.
Because NAT64 implies DNS64, which avoids NATing any dual stack service. This makes a major difference today. Bjørn
Current thread:
- Re: Ipv6 help, (continued)
- Re: Ipv6 help surfer (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help surfer (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help surfer (Aug 27)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 27)
- Re: Ipv6 help JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Bjørn Mork (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Aug 27)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka (Aug 27)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Andrews (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 27)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Andrews (Aug 27)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 27)
- Re: Ipv6 help Ca By (Aug 27)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka (Aug 27)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 27)