nanog mailing list archives

Re: sfps from fs dot com

From: Dennis Lundström <dennis () umnum ca>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 10:35:55 -0400

Had some issues in the past with Juniper-coded LR4 with sporadic
disconnections. Apart from those I don’t have any complaints beyond the odd
DOA.

—Dennis

On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 08:32 Nicholas Warren <nwarren () barryelectric com>
wrote:

Anyone have experience with fs.com's lasers? Are they reliable?

Current thread:

Re: sfps from fs dot com, (continued)
- - - Re: sfps from fs dot com Brandon Martin (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Brandon Martin (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Bryan Holloway (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Jason Lixfeld (Sep 20)
  - Re: sfps from fs dot com Bryan Holloway (Sep 20)
    - Re: sfps from fs dot com Jason Lixfeld (Sep 20)
    - Re: sfps from fs dot com Neil Hanlon (Sep 20)
    - Re: sfps from fs dot com Alain Hebert (Sep 23)
- RE: sfps from fs dot com Kevin McCormick (Sep 20)
- RE: sfps from fs dot com Chris Gross (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Dennis Lundström (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Matthew Crocker (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Carl Peterson (Sep 20)
  - Re: sfps from fs dot com Nikolas Geyer (Sep 20)
- RE: sfps from fs dot com Michel Py (Sep 20)