nanog mailing list archives
Re: sfps from fs dot com
From: Brandon Martin <lists.nanog () monmotha net>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 08:37:51 -0400
On 9/20/19 8:31 AM, Nicholas Warren wrote:
Anyone have experience with fs.com's lasers? Are they reliable?
I've had no complaints about reliability. In terms of transmit power and receiver performance, they seem to have a bit more variability than some of the bigger brands' offerings, but they seem to always be within spec.
They're cheap enough to keep several spares around and still come out ahead of buying name-brand let alone OEM vendor-branded optics, too.
-- Brandon Martin
Current thread:
- sfps from fs dot com Nicholas Warren (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Jared Mauch (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Mel Beckman (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Brandon Martin (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Mel Beckman (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Brandon Martin (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Bryan Holloway (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Jason Lixfeld (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Bryan Holloway (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Jason Lixfeld (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Neil Hanlon (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Alain Hebert (Sep 23)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Bryan Holloway (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Jared Mauch (Sep 20)
- RE: sfps from fs dot com Kevin McCormick (Sep 20)
- RE: sfps from fs dot com Chris Gross (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Dennis Lundström (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Matthew Crocker (Sep 20)