nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP Experiment
From: valdis.kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 21:33:35 -0500
On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 04:00:27 +1100, Ben Cooper said:
You caused again a massive prefix spike/flap,
That's twice now you've said that without any numbers or details. Care to explain what you mean by "massive" in a world where the IPv4 table has like 700K+ routes? And as percieved by what point(s) in the topology? Knowing where there are pockets of network admins shooting themselves in the foot drastically improves the ability of organizations like NetDotctors Without Borders to give proper aid where needed...
Current thread:
- Re: BGP Experiment, (continued)
- Re: BGP Experiment Saku Ytti (Jan 24)
- RE: BGP Experiment adamv0025 (Jan 31)
- Re: BGP Experiment Saku Ytti (Jan 31)
- Re: BGP Experiment Randy Bush (Jan 31)
- Re: BGP Experiment Christoffer Hansen (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Paul S. (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 23)
- Global statistics during the experiment (was Re: BGP Experiment) Mike Tancsa (Jan 24)
- Re: Global statistics during the experiment (was Re: BGP Experiment) Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 24)
- Re: BGP Experiment Mike Hale (Jan 24)
- Re: BGP Experiment valdis . kletnieks (Jan 24)
- Re: BGP Experiment Tom Beecher (Jan 25)
- Re: BGP Experiment Randy via NANOG (Jan 25)
- Re: BGP Experiment Mark Tees (Jan 25)
- Re: BGP Experiment Mark Tees (Jan 25)
- Re: BGP Experiment Randy Bush (Jan 26)
- Re: BGP Experiment Owen DeLong (Jan 26)
- Re: BGP Experiment valdis . kletnieks (Jan 26)
- Re: BGP Experiment Owen DeLong (Jan 26)
- Re: BGP Experiment Randy Bush (Jan 26)
- Re: BGP Experiment Eric Kuhnke (Jan 26)