nanog mailing list archives

Re: BGP Experiment


From: "Paul S." <contact () winterei se>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 09:22:48 +0900

Replying to throw in my support behind continuing the experiment as well.

Assurance that my gear will NOT fall over under adversarial situations is paramount, thank you for the research that you're doing to ensure that.

Ben, you may wish to re-evaluate how "rock solid" [1] your networking truly is if you're being taken down by random BGP updates.

As others have noted, the right target to be angry at is your equipment vendor.

[1]: https://packet.gg/

On 1/24/2019 02:19 午前, Italo Cunha wrote:
Ben, NANOG,

We have canceled this experiment permanently.

On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 12:00 PM Ben Cooper <ben () packet gg <mailto:ben () packet gg>> wrote:

    Can you stop this?

    You caused again a massive prefix spike/flap, and as the internet
    is not centered around NA (shock horror!) a number of operators in
    Asia and Australia go effected by your “expirment” and had no idea
    what was happening or why.

    Get a sandbox like every other researcher, as of now we have black
    holed and filtered your whole ASN, and have reccomended others do
    the same.



Current thread: