nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP Experiment
From: Nikolas Geyer <nik () neko id au>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 18:45:50 +0000
Throwing my support behind continuing the experiment also. A singular complaint from a company advertising unallocated ASN and IPv4 resources (the irony) does not warrant cessation of the experiment. The experiment is in compliance with the relevant RFCs, the affected “vendor” has released fixed software and announced it to their notifications list. I can only hope this and future research continues.
On Jan 23, 2019, at 1:39 PM, Christoffer Hansen <christoffer () netravnen de> wrote:On 23/01/2019 18:19, Italo Cunha wrote: We have canceled this experiment permanently.Sad to hear! :/ My impression if you continue is more users will get aware of bugs with running BGP implementations. Not all follow announcement from $vendor and will continue to run older broken code and complain to $vendor about errors with the software.
Current thread:
- Re: BGP Experiment, (continued)
- Re: BGP Experiment Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 23)
- RE: BGP Experiment Naslund, Steve (Jan 23)
- RE: BGP Experiment Naslund, Steve (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Nick Hilliard (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Filip Hruska (Jan 23)
- RE: BGP Experiment Naslund, Steve (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Owen DeLong (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment William Herrin (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Christoffer Hansen (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Nikolas Geyer (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment James Jun (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Christoffer Hansen (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Mark Tinka (Jan 23)
- RE: BGP Experiment adamv0025 (Jan 24)
- Re: BGP Experiment Brian Kantor (Jan 24)
- RE: BGP Experiment adamv0025 (Jan 24)
- Re: BGP Experiment Saku Ytti (Jan 24)
- RE: BGP Experiment adamv0025 (Jan 24)
- Re: BGP Experiment Saku Ytti (Jan 24)
- RE: BGP Experiment adamv0025 (Jan 31)