nanog mailing list archives
Re: the e-mail of the future is the e-mail oft the past, was Enough port 26 talk...
From: Stephen Satchell <list () satchell net>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 08:22:39 -0800
On 1/15/19 12:19 AM, Bjørn Mork wrote:
And everyone has a gmail account anyway, so why bother with outside email?
Two words: "search warrants." I'm a US citizen, and I do NOT like the idea of power-hungry people being able to paw through my mail. Having my own mail server, residing in my home, with medium security in place, gives me peace of mind. Even innocent people have things they want to hide from casual spying. THOSE people don't have a need to know. Period. Not to mention that I can obey the rule common in Business 101 regarding mail. It goes like this: QUESTION: You are a medium-sized company. How do you set up your mail room to be efficient, and needing only a small staff? ANSWER: You take out a number of post office boxes, and have each department use its post office box to receive mail for that department. You task one person to stop at the post office to pick up the contents of the post office box, properly banded. In short, you let the postal system sort your mail for you. They are very good at it, and can even bring automation (that you can't afford) to speed up the process. For me, I have a mail server with several dozen inboxes (Postfix/Dovecot). Only a couple of those e-mail addresses have been exposed to the world via mailing lists and USENET. Thunderbird does a nice job of presenting this gaggle of inboxes. And I keep adding mailboxes as the need arises. I can see which inboxes has incoming mail, and selectively look at each one as time permits. Yes, I see all the incoming spam that makes it through the DNSBLs, but I can ignore the spam-catchers when I have better things to do.
Current thread:
- Re: yet another round of SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request], (continued)
- Re: yet another round of SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request] Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan (Jan 12)
- Re: yet another round of SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request] Jason Hellenthal via NANOG (Jan 12)
- Re: yet another round of SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request] Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan (Jan 12)
- Re: yet another round of SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request] Jason Hellenthal via NANOG (Jan 12)
- Enough port 26 talk... Richard (Jan 12)
- Re: Enough port 26 talk... Bjørn Mork (Jan 13)
- Re: Enough port 26 talk... John Levine (Jan 13)
- Message not available
- Re: the e-mail of the future is the e-mail oft the past, was Enough port 26 talk... John R. Levine (Jan 14)
- Re: the e-mail of the future is the e-mail oft the past, was Enough port 26 talk... Miles Fidelman (Jan 14)
- Re: the e-mail of the future is the e-mail oft the past, was Enough port 26 talk... Bjørn Mork (Jan 15)
- Re: the e-mail of the future is the e-mail oft the past, was Enough port 26 talk... Stephen Satchell (Jan 15)
- Re: the e-mail of the future is the e-mail oft the past, was Enough port 26 talk... Tei (Jan 15)
- Re: the e-mail of the future is the e-mail oft the past, was Enough port 26 talk... James Downs (Jan 15)
- RE: the e-mail of the future is the e-mail oft the past, was Enough port 26 talk... Keith Medcalf (Jan 15)
- Re: the e-mail of the future is the e-mail oft the past, was Enough port 26 talk... Grant Taylor via NANOG (Jan 15)
- Re: yet another round of SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request] Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan (Jan 12)
- Re: yet another round of SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request] valdis . kletnieks (Jan 12)
- Re: yet another round of SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request] Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan (Jan 12)
- Re: yet another round of SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request] Ross Tajvar (Jan 12)
- Re: yet another round of SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request] Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan (Jan 12)
- Re: yet another round of SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request] valdis . kletnieks (Jan 12)