nanog mailing list archives

Re: Enough port 26 talk...

From: "John Levine" <johnl () iecc com>
Date: 13 Jan 2019 12:08:15 -0500

In article <871s5gpz1w.fsf () miraculix mork no> you write:

Yes.  What is all the fuzz about?  Email will be as dead as USENET in a
couple of years anyway.


Funny, people have been saying that pretty much every year since the
1990s.

What's different this time?

Current thread:

Re: yet another round of SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request], (continued)
- - - Re: yet another round of SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request] Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 12)
    - Re: yet another round of SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request] Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 12)
    - Re: yet another round of SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request] Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan (Jan 12)
    - Re: yet another round of SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request] Cummings, Chris (Jan 12)
    - Re: yet another round of SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request] Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan (Jan 12)
    - Re: yet another round of SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request] Jason Hellenthal via NANOG (Jan 12)
    - Re: yet another round of SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request] Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan (Jan 12)
    - Re: yet another round of SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request] Jason Hellenthal via NANOG (Jan 12)
    - Enough port 26 talk... Richard (Jan 12)
    - Re: Enough port 26 talk... Bjørn Mork (Jan 13)
    - Re: Enough port 26 talk... John Levine (Jan 13)
    - Message not available
    - Re: the e-mail of the future is the e-mail oft the past, was Enough port 26 talk... John R. Levine (Jan 14)
    - Re: the e-mail of the future is the e-mail oft the past, was Enough port 26 talk... Miles Fidelman (Jan 14)
    - Re: the e-mail of the future is the e-mail oft the past, was Enough port 26 talk... Bjørn Mork (Jan 15)
    - Re: the e-mail of the future is the e-mail oft the past, was Enough port 26 talk... Stephen Satchell (Jan 15)
    - Re: the e-mail of the future is the e-mail oft the past, was Enough port 26 talk... Tei (Jan 15)
    - Re: the e-mail of the future is the e-mail oft the past, was Enough port 26 talk... James Downs (Jan 15)
    - RE: the e-mail of the future is the e-mail oft the past, was Enough port 26 talk... Keith Medcalf (Jan 15)
    - Re: the e-mail of the future is the e-mail oft the past, was Enough port 26 talk... Grant Taylor via NANOG (Jan 15)
    - Re: yet another round of SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request] Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan (Jan 12)
    - Re: yet another round of SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request] valdis . kletnieks (Jan 12)

(Thread continues...)