nanog mailing list archives

Re: yet another round of SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request]


From: Ross Tajvar <ross () tajvar io>
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2019 18:30:34 -0500

Viruthagiri,

You are being too defensive. You've made this discussion about whether or
not someone is attacking you, rather than the merit of your idea. It is not
about networking or mail anymore. Please end the conversation here.

-Ross

On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 6:26 PM Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan <giri () dombox org>
wrote:

I don't know why you are all try to defend a man who try to silence my
work.

Are you saying this thread is necessary?

On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 4:46 AM Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera () gmail com>
wrote:

On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 12:51 AM Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan
<giri () dombox org> wrote:
5 months back I posted my spam research on DMARC list.
You have gone through only 50 words and judged my work.
The whole thread gone haywire because of you. I was
humiliated there and left.

By the way, since that you've left no traces of whatever piece of work
you've posted to that list. The website is empty, slides are removed
from Speakerdeck, etc.

In theory, I can easily recall a few cases in my life when going
through just 50 words was quite enough for a judgment.

To be very honest, I don't like you.

Please keep our busy mailing list out of this information, though for
me it's a valuable piece of data that someone I don't know personally
doesn't like someone else.

Although I don't like you, I still managed to respond politely in
IETF lists. Again... In that list the only thing you did was
attacking my work.

So, I've read the whole thread, and, as far as I can see, there was
nothing coming from John except for a balanced judgement.

And then please tell me this man is not biased at all.

Sorry, he's not.

--
Töma



--
Best Regards,

Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan
Dombox, Inc.


Current thread: