nanog mailing list archives
Re: Equinix
From: Paul Zugnoni via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2019 09:01:56 -0800
I'll second Martijn's comment and add this: Never choose "Next Available." It's the easy route up front but painful the rest of its life. We started predetermining where we wanted each of our xconnects (regardless which colo company) and submitting the port numbers with tickets / Equinix portal-based request. And it's been way smoother sailing since. You are you own source of truth, not the tech that serviced your ticket. PZ On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 8:33 AM Grzegorz Janoszka <grzegorz () janoszka pl> wrote:
On 05/12/2019 17:10, Martijn Schmidt via NANOG wrote:You're probably best off ordering those crossconnects through the Equinix portal, then you can choose the exact positions for the order that goes to the facility rather than relying on a human to transcribe them correctly from your PDF.If only Equinix portal reflected how your patch panels really look like... -- Grzegorz Janoszka
-- PZ Head of Datacenter and Network Infrastructure, Wish pz () wish com +1-650-313-3458
Current thread:
- Equinix Drew Weaver (Dec 05)
- Re: Equinix Clayton Zekelman (Dec 05)
- RE: Equinix Drew Weaver (Dec 05)
- Re: Equinix Martijn Schmidt via NANOG (Dec 05)
- Re: Equinix Grzegorz Janoszka (Dec 05)
- Re: Equinix Paul Zugnoni via NANOG (Dec 05)
- Re: Equinix Radu-Adrian Feurdean (Dec 06)
- RE: Equinix Drew Weaver (Dec 05)
- Re: Equinix Clayton Zekelman (Dec 05)