nanog mailing list archives

Re: Software Defined Networks


From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2019 12:16:48 -0500

I tell everyone we had SDNs in the 90s.

But we called it “expect scripts”.

:-)

-- 
TTFN,
patrick


On Dec 4, 2019, at 9:41 PM, Jennifer Rexford <jrex () cs princeton edu> wrote:

SDN is definitely an overloaded and confusing term that is used inconsistently.  Here are a few attempts to explain:

- “The Road to SDN: An Intellectual History of Programmable Networks” (ACM Queue, December 2013)
  https://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=2560327 <https://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=2560327>

- “Abstractions for Software-Defined Networks” (CACM, October 2014)
   http://www.cs.cornell.edu/~jnfoster/papers/sdn-abstractions.pdf 
<http://www.cs.cornell.edu/~jnfoster/papers/sdn-abstractions.pdf>

- “From Ethane to SDN and Beyond” (ACM SIGCOMM CCR, October 2019)
   https://ccronline.sigcomm.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/acmdl19-347.pdf 
<https://ccronline.sigcomm.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/acmdl19-347.pdf>

— Jen


On Dec 4, 2019, at 12:56 PM, Rod Beck <rod.beck () unitedcablecompany com <mailto:rod.beck () unitedcablecompany 
com>> wrote:

Can someone explain what is all the fuss? SDN is like the latest telecom craze but the articles do a poor job of 
explaining the advantages. I seek concrete examples. 

Regards, 

Roderick. 


Roderick Beck
VP of Business Development
United Cable Company
www.unitedcablecompany.com <http://www.unitedcablecompany.com/>
New York City & Budapest
rod.beck () unitedcablecompany com <mailto:rod.beck () unitedcablecompany com>
36-70-605-5144



Current thread: