Re: Starting to Drop Invalids for Customers

[Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>]

On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 7:32 PM Rubens Kuhl <rubensk () gmail com> wrote:
> > RPKI ROAs (compared to IRR objects) carry different meaning: the existence of a ROA (both by definition and common 
> > implementation) supersedes other data sources (IRR, LOAs, or comments in whois records, etc), and as such can be 
> > used on any type of EBGP session for validation of the received Internet routing information.
>
> Which brings me to my favorite possible RPKI-IRR integration: a ROA that says that IRR objects on IRR source x with 
> maintainer Y are authoritative for a given number resource. Kinda like SPF for BGP.

Is this required? or a crutch for use until a network can publish all
of their routing data in the RPKI?

-chris