nanog mailing list archives
Re: Starting to Drop Invalids for Customers
From: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 21:31:06 -0300
RPKI ROAs (compared to IRR objects) carry different meaning: the existence of a ROA (both by definition and common implementation) supersedes other data sources (IRR, LOAs, or comments in whois records, etc), and as such can be used on any type of EBGP session for validation of the received Internet routing information.
Which brings me to my favorite possible RPKI-IRR integration: a ROA that says that IRR objects on IRR source x with maintainer Y are authoritative for a given number resource. Kinda like SPF for BGP. Rubens
Current thread:
- Starting to Drop Invalids for Customers Mark Tinka (Dec 10)
- Re: Starting to Drop Invalids for Customers Randy Bush (Dec 10)
- Re: Starting to Drop Invalids for Customers Arturo Servin (Dec 10)
- Re: Starting to Drop Invalids for Customers Job Snijders (Dec 10)
- Re: Starting to Drop Invalids for Customers Rubens Kuhl (Dec 10)
- Re: Starting to Drop Invalids for Customers Christopher Morrow (Dec 10)
- Re: Starting to Drop Invalids for Customers Rubens Kuhl (Dec 11)
- Re: Starting to Drop Invalids for Customers Christopher Morrow (Dec 11)
- Re: Starting to Drop Invalids for Customers Matt Corallo (Dec 11)
- Re: Starting to Drop Invalids for Customers Christopher Morrow (Dec 11)
- Re: Starting to Drop Invalids for Customers Matt Corallo (Dec 11)
- Re: Starting to Drop Invalids for Customers Arturo Servin (Dec 10)
- Re: Starting to Drop Invalids for Customers Rubens Kuhl (Dec 11)
- Re: Starting to Drop Invalids for Customers Christopher Morrow (Dec 11)
- Re: Starting to Drop Invalids for Customers Randy Bush (Dec 10)
- Re: Starting to Drop Invalids for Customers Nick Hilliard (Dec 11)
- Re: Starting to Drop Invalids for Customers Randy Bush (Dec 16)