nanog mailing list archives
RE: unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes
From: Ryan Hamel <Ryan.Hamel () quadranet com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 20:22:28 +0000
All, My colleague has already contacted their friend at Psychz when I received the first message. Not everyone has to be on the list to get the message relayed to them. Rich, shall we all drop your email? It would achieve the same effect, and make this email thread more productive. Ryan -----Original Message----- From: NANOG <nanog-bounces () nanog org> On Behalf Of Rich Kulawiec Sent: Friday, July 27, 2018 5:36 AM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 04:19:22PM -0700, Dan Hollis wrote:
can we please just stop this nonsense?
An excellent way to stop this particular nonsense is to firewall out every network allocation under the control of Psychz. This achieves lossless compression of incoming data. ---rsk
Current thread:
- Re: unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes, (continued)
- Re: unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes Mel Beckman (Jul 24)
- Re: unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes Ross Tajvar (Jul 24)
- Re: unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes Christopher Morrow (Jul 24)
- Re: unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes Dan Hollis (Jul 24)
- Re: unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes John Levine (Jul 24)
- Re: unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes Mel Beckman (Jul 24)
- Re: unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes Daniel Corbe (Jul 24)
- Re: unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes Mel Beckman (Jul 24)
- Re: unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes Christopher Morrow (Jul 24)
- Re: unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes Joe Hamelin (Jul 25)
- RE: unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes Ryan Hamel (Jul 27)