Re: unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes

[Ross Tajvar <ross () tajvar io>]

Seemed pretty clear to me. He sent an abuse report to abuse () psychz net and
it was rejected as spam.

On Tue, Jul 24, 2018, 8:11 PM Mel Beckman <mel () beckman org> wrote:

> Dan,
>
> Are you saying Nanog if spamming you? It's not at all clear what your
> complaint is.
>
> -mel via cell
>
> > On Jul 24, 2018, at 4:37 PM, Brian Kantor <Brian () ampr org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 04:19:22PM -0700, Dan Hollis wrote:
> > > can we please just stop this nonsense?
> > >
> > > ip under your direct control originates sewage. you should accept
> reports as-is.
> > > requiring victims of your sewage to go through special contortions to
> > > report it to you is not acceptable.
> > >
> > > >  ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
> > > > <abuse () psychz net>
> > > >   (reason: 550 "The mail server detected your message as spam and has
> prevented delivery.")
> > abuse () fsec or kr and cert () fsec or kr do the same thing.
> >    - Brian