nanog mailing list archives
Re: unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes
From: Joe Hamelin <joe () nethead com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 23:58:59 -0700
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 10:13 PM Christopher Morrow < morrowc.lists () gmail com> wrote:
it's totally possible that the person who 'runs' the abuse@ is not the person that 'runs' the mail system at the places in question.
At my work you'll get an email issue addressed if you send it to postmaster@<OldFrenchAirplaneCompany>.com. RFC-2142 lays this out in section 5. In the last five years I've not had one email sent to it. This reminds me to review the others on the list to make sure they actually reach someone. Maybe a little incognito test. -Joe -- Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, +1 (360) 474-7474
Current thread:
- unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes Dan Hollis (Jul 24)
- Re: unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes Brian Kantor (Jul 24)
- Re: unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes Mel Beckman (Jul 24)
- Re: unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes Ross Tajvar (Jul 24)
- Re: unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes Christopher Morrow (Jul 24)
- Re: unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes Dan Hollis (Jul 24)
- Re: unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes John Levine (Jul 24)
- Re: unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes Mel Beckman (Jul 24)
- Re: unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes Daniel Corbe (Jul 24)
- Re: unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes Mel Beckman (Jul 24)
- Re: unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes Brian Kantor (Jul 24)
- Re: unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes Christopher Morrow (Jul 24)
- Re: unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes Joe Hamelin (Jul 25)
- RE: unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes Ryan Hamel (Jul 27)