nanog mailing list archives
Re: unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes
From: Mel Beckman <mel () beckman org>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 00:08:35 +0000
Dan, Are you saying Nanog if spamming you? It's not at all clear what your complaint is. -mel via cell
On Jul 24, 2018, at 4:37 PM, Brian Kantor <Brian () ampr org> wrote:On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 04:19:22PM -0700, Dan Hollis wrote: can we please just stop this nonsense? ip under your direct control originates sewage. you should accept reports as-is. requiring victims of your sewage to go through special contortions to report it to you is not acceptable.----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- <abuse () psychz net> (reason: 550 "The mail server detected your message as spam and has prevented delivery.")abuse () fsec or kr and cert () fsec or kr do the same thing. - Brian
Current thread:
- unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes Dan Hollis (Jul 24)
- Re: unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes Brian Kantor (Jul 24)
- Re: unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes Mel Beckman (Jul 24)
- Re: unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes Ross Tajvar (Jul 24)
- Re: unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes Christopher Morrow (Jul 24)
- Re: unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes Dan Hollis (Jul 24)
- Re: unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes John Levine (Jul 24)
- Re: unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes Mel Beckman (Jul 24)
- Re: unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes Daniel Corbe (Jul 24)
- Re: unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes Mel Beckman (Jul 24)
- Re: unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes Brian Kantor (Jul 24)
- Re: unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes Christopher Morrow (Jul 24)
- Re: unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes Joe Hamelin (Jul 25)
- RE: unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes Ryan Hamel (Jul 27)