nanog mailing list archives

Re: Threads that never end (was: Waste will kill ipv6 too)

From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2017 13:36:32 +0900

If anyone wants to TL;DR


moe: 2^128 is effectively infinita
larry: we thought 2^32 was effectively infinite
curly: we'll never need more than 640k
thomas watson: i think there is a world market for maybe five computers

Current thread:

Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too, (continued)
- - - Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Owen DeLong (Dec 28)
    - Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Thomas Bellman (Dec 28)
    - Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too James R Cutler (Dec 28)
    - Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too James R Cutler (Dec 28)
    - Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Brock Tice (Dec 28)
    - Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Laszlo Hanyecz (Dec 28)
    - Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Randy Bush (Dec 29)
    - Threads that never end (was: Waste will kill ipv6 too) Stephen Satchell (Dec 30)
    - Message not available
    - Re: Threads that never end (was: Waste will kill ipv6 too) sizone!math (Dec 30)
    - Re: Threads that never end Large Hadron Collider (Dec 30)
    - Re: Threads that never end (was: Waste will kill ipv6 too) Randy Bush (Dec 30)
    - Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Lyndon Nerenberg (Dec 28)
    - Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Lyndon Nerenberg (Dec 28)
    - Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Brock Tice (Dec 28)
    - Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Lyndon Nerenberg (Dec 28)
    - Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too valdis . kletnieks (Dec 28)
    - Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Mark Andrews (Dec 28)
    - Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too valdis . kletnieks (Dec 28)
    - Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Mark Andrews (Dec 28)
    - Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Owen DeLong (Dec 28)
    - Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Lyndon Nerenberg (Dec 28)

(Thread continues...)