nanog mailing list archives
Threads that never end (was: Waste will kill ipv6 too)
From: Stephen Satchell <list () satchell net>
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2017 06:42:46 -0800
On 12/29/2017 09:05 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
the good thing about these long threads, which have ZERO new information, is having a KillThread command in one's mail user agent. get a life!
I no longer use KillThread. Instead, I sort my inbox by subject, and use the Delete key liberally. NANOG is by no means my first mailing list where religious wars have broken out. (*cough* Linux kernel list) :)
Current thread:
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too, (continued)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Mel Beckman (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too bzs (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Mel Beckman (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Owen DeLong (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Thomas Bellman (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too James R Cutler (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too James R Cutler (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Brock Tice (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Laszlo Hanyecz (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Randy Bush (Dec 29)
- Threads that never end (was: Waste will kill ipv6 too) Stephen Satchell (Dec 30)
- Message not available
- Re: Threads that never end (was: Waste will kill ipv6 too) sizone!math (Dec 30)
- Re: Threads that never end Large Hadron Collider (Dec 30)
- Re: Threads that never end (was: Waste will kill ipv6 too) Randy Bush (Dec 30)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Lyndon Nerenberg (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Lyndon Nerenberg (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Brock Tice (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Lyndon Nerenberg (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too valdis . kletnieks (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Mark Andrews (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too valdis . kletnieks (Dec 28)