nanog mailing list archives
Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too
From: Laszlo Hanyecz <laszlo () heliacal net>
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 00:09:37 +0000
On 2017-12-28 23:28, Brock Tice wrote:
On 12/28/2017 03:44 PM, James R Cutler wrote:There is no prohibition of requesting an allocation which matches your network. That is, simply request what is needed with suitable data for justification and get your /40 or whatever.We are currently handing out /52s to customers. Based on a reasonable sparse allocation scheme that would account for future growth that seemed like the best option. I can't really see how /52 is too small for a residential customer. I know originally it was supposed to be /48 but after doing a bit of reading I think many people have admitted there is room for nuance. Do you think I could go to ARIN and say, well, we haven't used hardly any of this but based on such-and-such allocation scheme, it would be much better if you gave us a /32 instead of a /36?
The minimum size is /32 and you can get a shorter prefix with justification.
Also, does anyone know whether ARIN is using sparse allocation, such that if we go back later and ask for more they will just increase the size of our allocation starting from the same point? --Brock
Current thread:
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too, (continued)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Mel Beckman (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too bzs (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Mel Beckman (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too bzs (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Mel Beckman (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Owen DeLong (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Thomas Bellman (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too James R Cutler (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too James R Cutler (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Brock Tice (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Laszlo Hanyecz (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Randy Bush (Dec 29)
- Threads that never end (was: Waste will kill ipv6 too) Stephen Satchell (Dec 30)
- Message not available
- Re: Threads that never end (was: Waste will kill ipv6 too) sizone!math (Dec 30)
- Re: Threads that never end Large Hadron Collider (Dec 30)
- Re: Threads that never end (was: Waste will kill ipv6 too) Randy Bush (Dec 30)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Lyndon Nerenberg (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Lyndon Nerenberg (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Brock Tice (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Lyndon Nerenberg (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too valdis . kletnieks (Dec 28)