nanog mailing list archives
Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too
From: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon () orthanc ca>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2017 17:12:30 -0800
On Dec 28, 2017, at 4:57 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon () orthanc ca> wrote: Instead, think about how we can carve up a 2^61 address space (based on the current /3 active global allocation pool) between 2^32 people (Earth's current population)
Of course, I screwed up the numbers (thanks Javier for pointing this out). 2^32 is closer to 2^33 for population, so adjust the netmasks accordingly.
Current thread:
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too, (continued)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too James R Cutler (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too James R Cutler (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Brock Tice (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Laszlo Hanyecz (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Randy Bush (Dec 29)
- Threads that never end (was: Waste will kill ipv6 too) Stephen Satchell (Dec 30)
- Message not available
- Re: Threads that never end (was: Waste will kill ipv6 too) sizone!math (Dec 30)
- Re: Threads that never end Large Hadron Collider (Dec 30)
- Re: Threads that never end (was: Waste will kill ipv6 too) Randy Bush (Dec 30)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Lyndon Nerenberg (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Lyndon Nerenberg (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Brock Tice (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Lyndon Nerenberg (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too valdis . kletnieks (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Mark Andrews (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too valdis . kletnieks (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Mark Andrews (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Owen DeLong (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Lyndon Nerenberg (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Ricky Beam (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Mark Andrews (Dec 28)