nanog mailing list archives
Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption
From: Matthew Kaufman <matthew () matthew at>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 17:55:19 -0700
On 10/1/2015 5:16 PM, Ca By wrote:
I run a large 464xlat dominated mobile network. IPv4 bits are materially more expensive to deliver.
Isn't that simply a consequence of your engineering decision to use 464xlat instead of native dual-stack, as was originally envisioned for the transition?
And, as FB has shared, IPv6 is more performant for end users, and more performant is more profitable
Isn't that also at least partially a consequence of your engineering decision to use 464xlat?
Matthew Kaufman
Current thread:
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption, (continued)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Owen DeLong (Oct 03)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Ca By (Oct 03)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Jérôme Fleury (Oct 03)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Wolfgang S. Rupprecht (Oct 04)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Damian Menscher via NANOG (Oct 01)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Hugo Slabbert (Oct 01)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Damian Menscher via NANOG (Oct 02)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Hugo Slabbert (Oct 02)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Hugo Slabbert (Oct 02)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Ca By (Oct 01)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Matthew Kaufman (Oct 01)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Ca By (Oct 01)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Dovid Bender (Oct 01)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Todd Underwood (Oct 01)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Fred Baker (fred) (Oct 02)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption William Herrin (Oct 02)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Todd Underwood (Oct 02)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Fred Baker (fred) (Oct 02)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Owen DeLong (Oct 03)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Chuck Anderson (Oct 01)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Owen DeLong (Oct 01)