nanog mailing list archives
Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption
From: "Wolfgang S. Rupprecht" <wolfgang.rupprecht () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 18:44:19 -0700
(IPv6 ONLY insisting on manufacturers implementing 464XLAT is inferior in every way to dual stack,
There is one way it is superior; it rewards web and other content sites that implement IPv6. Unlike dual stack, it applies pressure where it is needed, on the IPv4-only sites. Grottiness can be a good thing. -wolfgang
Current thread:
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption, (continued)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Stephen Satchell (Oct 02)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Mark Andrews (Oct 02)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Brett A Mansfield (Oct 02)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Robin Johansson (Oct 02)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Owen DeLong (Oct 03)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Israel G. Lugo (Oct 07)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Mark Andrews (Oct 07)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Owen DeLong (Oct 03)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Ca By (Oct 03)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Jérôme Fleury (Oct 03)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Wolfgang S. Rupprecht (Oct 04)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Damian Menscher via NANOG (Oct 01)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Hugo Slabbert (Oct 01)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Damian Menscher via NANOG (Oct 02)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Hugo Slabbert (Oct 02)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Hugo Slabbert (Oct 02)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Ca By (Oct 01)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Matthew Kaufman (Oct 01)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Ca By (Oct 01)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Dovid Bender (Oct 01)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Todd Underwood (Oct 01)