nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 Default Allocation - What size allocation are you giving out


From: Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 21:53:17 +0700


On Oct 10, 2014, at 9:45 PM, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:

I’m sorry, but this argument utterly fails under any form of analysis.

I think he's talking about IPv4 - and saying that since he apparently doesn't have the budget for enough IPv4 subnets 
to address his point-to-point links, he's inclined to repeat this suboptimal practice on the IPv6 side in the name of 
'consistency'.

But he knows best, and we oughtn't to try and dissuade him any further, as that just upsets him.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>

                   Equo ne credite, Teucri.

                          -- Laocoön


Current thread: