nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Default Allocation - What size allocation are you giving out
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 10:19:16 -0400
Policy allows any ISP (LIR) with need greater than /32 to easily qualify for what they need up to /12. I know of at least two entities that have applied for and with minimal effort and appropriate justification, received /24 allocations and many with /28s. Owen
On Oct 9, 2014, at 07:00, Paige Thompson <paigeadele () gmail com> wrote: makes more sense to hand out /48s imho. theres only a mere 65k /48s per /32 (or something like that), though.On 10/09/14 12:29, Mark Andrews wrote: In message <1AA6F1A9-D63B-4066-903D-0E8690C7C567 () isi edu>, manning bill writes:yes! by ALL means, hand out /48s. There is huge benefit to announcing = all that dark space, esp. when virtually no one practices BCP-38, esp in IPv6 land. /bill PO Box 12317 Marina del Rey, CA 90295 310.322.8102and if everyone hands out /48's you just filter /48's. With a mix of /56 and /48 you need to filter at the /56 level. Given enterpises are getting /48's it will be simpler overall for everyone to get /48's.On 8October2014Wednesday, at 18:31, Mark Andrews <marka () isc org> wrote: =20 Give them a /48. This is IPv6 not IPv4. Take the IPv4 glasses off and put on the IPv6 glasses. Stop constraining your customers because you feel that it is a waste. It is not a waste!!!! It will also reduce the number of exceptions you need to process and make over all administration easier. =20 As for only two subnets, I expect lots of equipment to request prefixes in the future not just traditional routers. It will have descrete internal components which communicate using IPv6 and those components need to talk to each other and the world. In a IPv4 world they would be NAT'd. In a IPv6 world the router requests a prefix. =20 Mark =20 In message <495D0934DA46854A9CA758393724D5906DA244 () NI-MAIL02 nii ads>, =Erik Sundberg writes:I am planning out our IPv6 deployment right now and I am trying to =figure o=3Dut our default allocation for customer LAN blocks. So what is =everyone givi=3Dng for a default LAN allocation for IPv6 Customers. I guess the idea =of ha=3Dnding a customer /56 (256 /64s) or a /48 (65,536 /64s) just makes me =cring=3De at the waste. Especially when you know 90% of customers will never =have m=3Dore than 2 or 3 subnets. As I see it the customer can always ask for =more I=3DPv6 Space. =20 /64 /60 /56 /48 =20 Small Customer? Medium Customer? Large Customer? =20 Thanks =20 Erik =20 ________________________________ =20 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail transmission, and any documents, =files =3Dor previous e-mail messages attached to it may contain confidential =informa=3Dtion that is legally privileged. If you are not the intended =recipient, or =3Da person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you =are h=3Dereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of =any of =3Dthe information contained in or attached to this transmission is =STRICTLY P=3DROHIBITED. If you have received this transmission in error please =notify th=3De sender immediately by replying to this e-mail. You must destroy the =origi=3Dnal transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any =manne=3Dr. Thank you.--=20 Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka () isc org
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Default Allocation - What size allocation for Loopback Address, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Default Allocation - What size allocation for Loopback Address joel jaeggli (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 Default Allocation - What size allocation for Loopback Address Mark Andrews (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 Default Allocation - What size allocation are you giving out Owen DeLong (Oct 10)
- Re: IPv6 Default Allocation - What size allocation are you giving out Roland Dobbins (Oct 10)
- Re: IPv6 Default Allocation - What size allocation are you giving out William Herrin (Oct 09)
- Re: IPv6 Default Allocation - What size allocation are you giving out Owen DeLong (Oct 09)
- Re: IPv6 Default Allocation - What size allocation are you giving out Baldur Norddahl (Oct 09)
- Re: IPv6 Default Allocation - What size allocation are you giving out Roland Dobbins (Oct 09)
- Re: IPv6 Default Allocation - What size allocation are you giving out Tore Anderson (Oct 09)
- Re: IPv6 Default Allocation - What size allocation are you giving out Lee (Oct 11)
- Re: IPv6 Default Allocation - What size allocation are you giving out Owen DeLong (Oct 09)
- Re: IPv6 Default Allocation - What size allocation are you giving out William Herrin (Oct 09)
- Re: IPv6 Default Allocation - What size allocation are you giving out Faisal Imtiaz (Oct 09)
- Re: IPv6 Default Allocation - What size allocation are you giving out Paul S. (Oct 09)
- Re: IPv6 Default Allocation - What size allocation are you giving out Owen DeLong (Oct 09)
- Re: IPv6 Default Allocation - What size allocation are you giving out Faisal Imtiaz (Oct 09)