nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 Default Allocation - What size allocation are you giving out


From: Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 04:18:46 +0700


On Oct 10, 2014, at 3:53 AM, Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl () gmail com> wrote:

I am not dismissing any arguments, and I am genuinely interested in any advantages and disadvantages to the approach.

My prediction is that you will remain an advocate of unnumbered links until such time as you have to troubleshoot 
issues hop-by-hop in a network of any non-trivial size/complexity.  Then, your views on this topic will likely change.

Many of the same caveats noted in RFC6752 apply to unnumbered interfaces, as well.  That's why I cited it.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>

                   Equo ne credite, Teucri.

                          -- Laocoön


Current thread: