nanog mailing list archives
Re: SIP on FTTH systems
From: Anders Löwinger <anders () abundo se>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 01:32:43 +0100
On 2014-02-11 23:41, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
Is there not an issue with this if the customer is connected directly to the access device over L2? They will not communicate with each other direcly, all traffic will be exchanged through the default gateway?Yes, what's the problem with that?
Bad description by me. I'll try again.If I have two PCs in my home, connected with GE to a L2 switch and I buy 10 Mbit Internet access, I don't want traffic between my two PCs to be exchanged through the default route.
They could possible communicate directly using link-local, but I'm not sure how they would find each other?
Default gw could send a redirect...
I'd venture to say that any IPv6 implementation that doesn't support this is broken and should be fixed by the implementor.
Agree. /Anders
Current thread:
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems, (continued)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Jay Ashworth (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 07)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Anders Löwinger (Feb 07)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 07)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 07)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 07)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 08)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Anders Löwinger (Feb 11)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 11)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Anders Löwinger (Feb 11)
- RE: SIP on FTTH systems Frank Bulk (Feb 11)
- RE: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 11)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Anders Löwinger (Feb 13)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 13)
- RE: SIP on FTTH systems Frank Bulk (Feb 07)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 07)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Jay Ashworth (Feb 07)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 07)