nanog mailing list archives
Re: SIP on FTTH systems
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 08:55:52 +0200
On Saturday, February 08, 2014 06:38:29 AM Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
That's one way of doing it, or you give it an IA_NA as well if you want a WAN address.
We prefer DHCP_IA_NA to ND/RA. But yes, either option works. Just depends on operator choice as well as BNG and CPE support. Mark.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Current thread:
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems, (continued)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Anders Löwinger (Feb 07)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 07)
- RE: SIP on FTTH systems Frank Bulk (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Jay Ashworth (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Jay Ashworth (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 07)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Anders Löwinger (Feb 07)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 07)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 07)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 07)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 08)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Anders Löwinger (Feb 11)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 11)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Anders Löwinger (Feb 11)
- RE: SIP on FTTH systems Frank Bulk (Feb 11)
- RE: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 11)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Anders Löwinger (Feb 13)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 13)
- RE: SIP on FTTH systems Frank Bulk (Feb 07)