nanog mailing list archives
Re: SIP on FTTH systems
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 10:21:40 +0200
On Saturday, February 08, 2014 09:08:43 AM Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
I have never heard anyone refer to SLAAC as IA_NA.
Because it's not. I said "prefer DHCP_IA_NA to ND/RA".
When saying IA_NA and IA_PD, you should take for granted people mean DHCP.
Anders asked whether ND/RA for the CPE WAN address + DHCP_IA_PD (commonly written as DHCP-PD) is a valid option, to which you replied DHCP_IA_NA can be used for the CPE WAN address as well, to which I added I prefer (over ND/RA, that is). Again, violent agreement, Mikael. Whether I write "DHCP_IA_NA or just IA_NA", "DHCP_IA_PD or just DHCP-PD" it is all implicitly understood to mean "the DHCP kind". Mark.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Current thread:
- RE: SIP on FTTH systems, (continued)
- RE: SIP on FTTH systems Frank Bulk (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Jay Ashworth (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Jay Ashworth (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 07)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Anders Löwinger (Feb 07)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 07)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 07)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 07)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 08)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Anders Löwinger (Feb 11)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 11)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Anders Löwinger (Feb 11)
- RE: SIP on FTTH systems Frank Bulk (Feb 11)
- RE: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 11)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Anders Löwinger (Feb 13)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 13)
- RE: SIP on FTTH systems Frank Bulk (Feb 07)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 07)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Jay Ashworth (Feb 07)