nanog mailing list archives
Re: SIP on FTTH systems
From: Anders Löwinger <anders () abundo se>
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 04:57:22 +0100
On 2014-02-07 07:14, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
and for IPv6 it's easily solvable by not announcing an on-link network so they won't even try to communicate directly with each other but instead everything is routed via the ISP upstream router and then down again to the other customer CPE/computer.
I'm curious on the details: 1)Do you give the client 64 bit using RA (with the A and L bit cleared), 64 bit using DHCPv6, then force the traffic through the default since on-link is not set?
Has there been any test if modern operating systems honor this?(I've seen some firewalls doing this, not sure it was by design, they changed the default in later code)
2) Do you only use link-local on the customer port, and use a L3 CPE & DHCP-PD? Always a learning experience reading Nanog.... /Anders
Current thread:
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems, (continued)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 07)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Anders Löwinger (Feb 07)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 07)
- RE: SIP on FTTH systems Frank Bulk (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Jay Ashworth (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Jay Ashworth (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 07)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Anders Löwinger (Feb 07)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 07)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 07)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 07)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 08)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Anders Löwinger (Feb 11)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 11)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Anders Löwinger (Feb 11)
- RE: SIP on FTTH systems Frank Bulk (Feb 11)
- RE: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 11)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Anders Löwinger (Feb 13)