nanog mailing list archives

Re: De-funding the ITU


From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 11:12:56 -0800


On Jan 14, 2013, at 7:27 AM, John Levine <johnl () iecc com> wrote:

There'd have to be some organization to negotiate and oversee
international settlements and other, similar, regulations.

Why? The internet has operated just fine without such for quite some time
now.

The Internet is held together with spit and duct tape, and sucks for
connections that need a stable low-jitter channel, we've all noticed.
It has no principle of universal service.

The Internet does what it does surprisingly well, but it's not the
same kind of network as the phone system.  We all know of the abuses
that can come with mandatory interconnection and settlements, but the
solution is not to cut off the poor countries.

I have no reason whatsoever to believe that defunding the ITU would
cut off the poor countries.

Quite the contrary, actually. I believe that the combination of the ITU
and the back-pocket distribution of settlement checks has held back the
improvement of digital connections to poorer countries.

Owen



Current thread: