nanog mailing list archives
Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats
From: "Jima" <nanog () jima tk>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 08:17:10 -0700 (MST)
On Thu, January 10, 2013 7:53 am, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
As for v6 how popular do you see it getting for mail?
Are you implying that when the internet otherwise moves on to IPv6, we'll
still inexplicably use IPv4 for mail?
Jima
Current thread:
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats, (continued)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats John Levine (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Jon Lewis (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Julian DeMarchi (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats William Herrin (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Joe Provo (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Chris Adams (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Dave Sparro (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Jima (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Jared Mauch (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats John Levine (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Daniel Taylor (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats joel jaeggli (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Dave Sparro (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Karl Auer (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Matthias Leisi (Jan 10)