nanog mailing list archives
Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 08:54:59 +0530
One $GENERATE in bind should take care of that, and save what looks like the usual extra long nanog thread? What does it cost you not to do it? On Thursday, January 10, 2013, Julian DeMarchi wrote:
On 01/10/2013 01:16 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:Ask your customers what I asked you. Are they actually seeing emailblockedand bounced because of that spam rats listing.They are yes. Emails are being blocked due to the listing on spamrats. For our colo ranges we do not set PTRs by default. I do for the hosts I run. I do beleive in BCP. :)
-- --srs (iPad)
Current thread:
- [SHAME] Spam Rats Julian DeMarchi (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Julian DeMarchi (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Julian DeMarchi (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats John Levine (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Julian DeMarchi (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Jon Lewis (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Julian DeMarchi (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats William Herrin (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Joe Provo (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Jima (Jan 10)