nanog mailing list archives
Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats
From: Julian DeMarchi <julian () jdcomputers com au>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 13:10:48 +1000
On 01/10/2013 01:06 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Who uses it? Or did you see your IP listed in one of those multiple dnsbl query sites and contacted them on general principles even though you didn't see any actual bounced email that could be traced to a spam rats listing?
Customers use the range. They had a complaint to us that the IP was listed by spamrats and thus the issue made it to my queue.
That said, it is best practice to set ptr records even for your unassigned ip space
Mail servers do need to have PTRs, but it is my _choice_ if my hosts that do not send mail have PTRs or not. I would not expect anyone to block my /24 for lack of PTRs on non-mail-sending hosts. --julian
Current thread:
- [SHAME] Spam Rats Julian DeMarchi (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Julian DeMarchi (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Julian DeMarchi (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats John Levine (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Julian DeMarchi (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Jon Lewis (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Julian DeMarchi (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats William Herrin (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Joe Provo (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 09)