nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISPs and full packet inspection
From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 10:25:08 -0400
Inside counsel should engage with outside counsel in this case. Part of being a professional in many fields is knowing how to engage the right people (e.g.: doctors that refer you to an expert). - jared On May 24, 2012, at 9:13 AM, not common wrote:
Thanks guys, I am looking for stuff to bring to my legal team (which is one guy, that can't spell IP) and VPs. There has to be some thing out there or is this really a hands of topic?
Current thread:
- ISPs and full packet inspection not common (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection jim deleskie (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection -Hammer- (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection not common (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection Gabriel Blanchard (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection -Hammer- (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection -Hammer- (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection John Curran (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection valdis . kletnieks (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection not common (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection not common (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection Jared Mauch (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection Jay Ashworth (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection -Hammer- (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection Jason Hellenthal (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection Justin M. Streiner (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection Jay Ashworth (May 24)