nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISPs and full packet inspection
From: John Curran <jcurran () istaff org>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 09:22:55 -0400
On May 24, 2012, at 9:13 AM, not common wrote:
Thanks guys, I am looking for stuff to bring to my legal team (which is one guy, that can't spell IP) and VPs.
One reasonably balanced and relatively recent overview for your legal folks to get oriented: <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1628024> If that does not suffice, you have a more serious issue. Best wishes, /John
Current thread:
- ISPs and full packet inspection not common (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection jim deleskie (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection -Hammer- (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection not common (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection Gabriel Blanchard (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection -Hammer- (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection -Hammer- (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection John Curran (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection valdis . kletnieks (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection not common (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection not common (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection Jared Mauch (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection Jay Ashworth (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection -Hammer- (May 24)