nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISPs and full packet inspection
From: not common <notcommonmistakes () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 09:32:05 -0400
Thank you all, this will get me started and @Hammer, I see the trend your talking about. Cheers, On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:24 AM, <valdis.kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2012 09:13:16 -0400, not common said:Thanks guys, I am looking for stuff to bring to my legal team (which isoneguy, that can't spell IP) and VPs.You probably want to fix that legal team. If you're an ISP and your legal eagle doesn't understand networking, you're opening yourself up to a world of hurt.There has to be some thing out there or is this really a hands of topic?There's a whole mess of applicable laws. Patrick Darden just posed a good intro as I was writing this.
Current thread:
- ISPs and full packet inspection not common (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection jim deleskie (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection -Hammer- (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection not common (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection Gabriel Blanchard (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection -Hammer- (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection -Hammer- (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection John Curran (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection valdis . kletnieks (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection not common (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection not common (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection Jared Mauch (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection Jay Ashworth (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection -Hammer- (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection Jason Hellenthal (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection Justin M. Streiner (May 24)