nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISPs and full packet inspection
From: jim deleskie <deleskie () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 09:53:48 -0300
Asking for legal advice on NANOG is probably a REALLY REALLY bad idea. Talk to a lawyer in the area(s) you do business. -jim On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:50 AM, not common <notcommonmistakes () gmail com> wrote:
Hello, I am looking for some guidance on full packet inspection at the ISP level. Is there any regulations that prohibit or provide guidance on this?
Current thread:
- ISPs and full packet inspection not common (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection jim deleskie (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection -Hammer- (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection not common (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection Gabriel Blanchard (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection -Hammer- (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection -Hammer- (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection John Curran (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection valdis . kletnieks (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection not common (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection not common (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection Jared Mauch (May 24)
- Re: ISPs and full packet inspection Jay Ashworth (May 24)