nanog mailing list archives
Re: Customer Notification System.
From: acv <acv () miniguru ca>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:46:30 -0500
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 08:34:49AM -0800, JC Dill wrote:
99.999% of the time there is absolutely no benefit in the attachment. But by pushing customers to open attachments to get the content we are encouraging them to be complacent about opening all attachments, and that's a great way to end up getting infected with malware.
I agree whole heartedly. If the Marketing/Sales folks are stuck up on branding, I'd explore sending a MIME multipart/alternative with branded HTML and a plain text version with no degradation of actual content. And keep the whole thing under 25-30KB total. Creating them is pretty easy with perl MIME::Lite. Alex
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Customer Notification System., (continued)
- Re: Customer Notification System. Dan White (Feb 21)
- Re: Customer Notification System. Alex Leach (Feb 21)
- Re: Customer Notification System. Adam Rothschild (Feb 21)
- Re: Customer Notification System. Jay Ashworth (Feb 21)
- Re: Customer Notification System. Rich Kulawiec (Feb 22)
- RE: Customer Notification System. Leigh Porter (Feb 22)
- Re: Customer Notification System. James Wininger (Feb 22)
- Re: Customer Notification System. R. Scott Evans (Feb 22)
- Re: Customer Notification System. Daniel Rohan (Feb 22)
- Re: Customer Notification System. JC Dill (Feb 22)
- Re: Customer Notification System. acv (Feb 22)
- Re: Customer Notification System. James Wininger (Feb 22)
- Re: Customer Notification System. JC Dill (Feb 23)
- RE: Customer Notification System. Vinny_Abello (Feb 23)
- Re: Customer Notification System. Rich Kulawiec (Feb 23)
- Re: Customer Notification System. Tom Pipes (Feb 21)