nanog mailing list archives
Re: economic value of low AS numbers
From: "Robert E. Seastrom" <rs () seastrom com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:11:54 -0500
Jeffrey Ollie <jeff () ocjtech us> writes:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com> wrote:The real question is whether it was issued after HHGTTG.HHGTTG first appeared on the BBC in 1978. Thinking Machines Corporation was formed in 1982. As far as I can tell the first BGP RFC is 1105 and was published in 1989.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc827 -r
Current thread:
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers, (continued)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers David Conrad (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Hank Nussbacher (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Keegan Holley (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Richard Irving (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers David Conrad (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Dave Hart (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Daniel Roesen (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Barry Shein (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Jay Ashworth (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Jeffrey Ollie (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Robert E. Seastrom (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Jeffrey Ollie (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Dave Hart (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Robert Bonomi (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Jay Ashworth (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Dave Hart (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Keegan Holley (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Jim Mercer (Nov 17)
- Message not available
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Owen DeLong (Nov 17)