nanog mailing list archives
Re: economic value of low AS numbers
From: Keegan Holley <keegan.holley () sungard com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:34:48 -0500
2011/11/17 Dave Hart <davehart () gmail com>
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 18:55, Keegan Holley <keegan.holley () sungard com> wrote:I suppose I can't argue with that, but anyone technical enough to know what an AS is should know better. Also, would it really count? What ifIopened a small ISP in some carrier hotel and paid 1000 bucks for AS 1.I'mnot sure I'd want to sign a contract with someone dumb enough to think I was the first company on the internet.Did you intend to say the first autonomous system number assigned for use on ARPAnet? Pedantically yours,
I have to admit I wasn't sure. I know ARPAnet predated BGP and EGP I believe so I wasn't sure if there were ASN's then.
Current thread:
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers, (continued)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Daniel Roesen (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Barry Shein (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Jay Ashworth (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Jeffrey Ollie (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Robert E. Seastrom (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Jeffrey Ollie (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Dave Hart (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Robert Bonomi (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Jay Ashworth (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Dave Hart (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Keegan Holley (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Jim Mercer (Nov 17)
- Message not available
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Owen DeLong (Nov 17)
- Message not available
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Owen DeLong (Nov 17)