nanog mailing list archives
Re: economic value of low AS numbers
From: Dave Hart <davehart () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 19:09:56 +0000
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 18:55, Keegan Holley <keegan.holley () sungard com> wrote:
I suppose I can't argue with that, but anyone technical enough to know what an AS is should know better. Also, would it really count? What if I opened a small ISP in some carrier hotel and paid 1000 bucks for AS 1. I'm not sure I'd want to sign a contract with someone dumb enough to think I was the first company on the internet.
Did you intend to say the first autonomous system number assigned for use on ARPAnet? Pedantically yours, Dave Hart
Current thread:
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers, (continued)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Dave Hart (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Daniel Roesen (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Barry Shein (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Jay Ashworth (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Jeffrey Ollie (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Robert E. Seastrom (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Jeffrey Ollie (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Dave Hart (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Robert Bonomi (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Jay Ashworth (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Dave Hart (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Keegan Holley (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Jim Mercer (Nov 17)
- Message not available
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Owen DeLong (Nov 17)
- Message not available
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Owen DeLong (Nov 17)