nanog mailing list archives
Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
From: Robert Bonomi <bonomi () mail r-bonomi com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:04:40 -0500 (CDT)
From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi.com () nanog org Mon Jun 20 00:15:32 2011 To: David Conrad <drc () virtualized org> From: Mark Andrews <marka () isc org> Subject: Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:14:49 +1000 Cc: NANOG list <nanog () nanog org> In message <83163718-FA5B-47BA-BA50-67701ABD5601 () virtualized org>, David Conrad writes:On Jun 19, 2011, at 6:39 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:I'm curious how anyone that has not signed a agreement with ICANN can be bound to anything in any applicant guide book. =20In order to obtain a gTLD, you have to sign a contractual agreement with = ICANN.David, you are missing the point. The TM holder doesn't want the gtld, they just want to protect their trademark. The TM holder doesn't have a contract with ICANN. They do however have a legitimate right to the name and want to spend $0 keeping the name out of anybodys hands but theirs. $187K is not longer a amount to be sneezed at. MarkAlso rfp-clean-30may11-en.pdf basically deals with <tm>.<gtld>.You might want to re-read pretty much any part of that document (e.g., = the title). Regards, -drc-- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka () isc org
Current thread:
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs, (continued)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Mark Andrews (Jun 20)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Tony Finch (Jun 21)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Mark Andrews (Jun 19)
- RE: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs George Bonser (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Mark Andrews (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs David Conrad (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Mark Andrews (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs David Conrad (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Mark Andrews (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs David Conrad (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Robert Bonomi (Jun 20)
- RE: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs George Bonser (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs John Levine (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs John R. Levine (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Owen DeLong (Jun 20)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Matthew Palmer (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs David Conrad (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Joly MacFie (Jun 20)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs John Levine (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Jay Ashworth (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Mark Andrews (Jun 19)