nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent depeers ESnet
From: "George B." <georgeb () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 10:09:17 -0700
internet connectivity, and that much $ is at stake, you're stupid if you don't have some redundancy. Nothing works all the time forever.I can't consider Cogent even a redundant link, since I need two other upstreams to reach the Internet redundantly. -cjp
Well, they aren't someone you can take a default route from (either ipv4 or ipv6), that's for sure. So yeah, could use them if taking full routes.
Current thread:
- Cogent depeers ESnet Nick Hilliard (Jun 18)
- Re: Cogent depeers ESnet George B. (Jun 18)
- Re: Cogent depeers ESnet Robert Bonomi (Jun 19)
- Re: Cogent depeers ESnet Christopher Pilkington (Jun 19)
- Re: Cogent depeers ESnet Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 19)
- Re: Cogent depeers ESnet George B. (Jun 19)
- Re: Cogent depeers ESnet Robert Bonomi (Jun 19)
- SLA covering 3rd party assets, financial incentives Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 19)
- Re: Cogent depeers ESnet Robert Bonomi (Jun 19)
- Re: Cogent depeers ESnet George B. (Jun 18)
- Re: Cogent depeers ESnet Jon Lewis (Jun 20)
- Re: Cogent depeers ESnet Christopher Pilkington (Jun 20)
- Re: Cogent depeers ESnet George B. (Jun 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Cogent depeers ESnet Cameron Byrne (Jun 21)